Obama Warns of Dire
Consequences
Without Stimulus
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post. |
Thursday, January 8, 2009; 3:50 PM
President-elect Barack Obama today warned of double digit unemployment and a "generation" of lost earnings if his upcoming economic stimulus plan is not enacted quickly by Congress. In a speech today at George Mason University in Fairfax, Obama warned that failure to pass the plan -- expected to cost as much as $800 billion -- means that "a bad situation could become dramatically worse."
"For every day we wait or point fingers or drag our feet, more Americans will lose their jobs. More families will lose their savings. More dreams will be deferred and denied," Obama said. "And our nation will sink deeper into a crisis that, at some point, we may not be able to reverse."
The speech today marks the start of the formal campaign to move through Congress a stimulus package that Obama today portrayed in broad strokes as an effort to "retrofit America" -- rebuilding infrastructure while also investing in alternative energy, modernizing schools and extending broadband Internet service to rural areas.
In his speech, Obama blamed the current situation on "profound irresponsibility" -- from money centers like Wall Street to power centers like Washington -- and confronted the critics of his plan directly. He acknowledged both the staggering cost of his proposals and the enormous debt it will impose on future generations. To assuage those concerns, Obama pledges "an unprecedented effort to eliminate unwise and unnecessary spending."
He conceded what skeptics have already said: that the government has already spent a lot of money to turn around the economy with little apparent result.
"We haven't yet seen that translate into more jobs or higher incomes or renewed confidence in our economy," he said.
But, he added, "that's why the American Recovery and Reinvestment Plan won't just throw money at our problems -- we'll invest in what works. The true test of policies we'll pursue won't be whether they're Democratic or Republican ideas . . . but whether they create jobs, grow our economy, and put the American Dream within reach of the American people."
Obama did not unveil the plan itself today. In comments this week, he said that his staff and members of Congress were continuing to work out the final size of the proposal and its details.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) told reporters today that House committees will consider the bill the week of Jan. 19 and she plans to hold a House vote during the last week of January. She said that she has instructed the House leadership team to "think differently" because Democrats now have a larger majority in Congress and control the White House.
Now we have arrived. We have a big, strong, 80-vote majority," she said, explaining it's more important than ever to get things right rather than just passing them quickly.
Under this new timeline, a delay of several weeks from the original timeframe, the Senate would not take up the legislation until the first week of February. Any differences between the two chambers' stimulus plans would require a House-Senate conference committee to reconcile the differences after that, and then the compromise legislation would go back to both chambers. That could put the final passage into mid or late February.
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and House Minority Leader John Boehner, at a press conference after Obama's speech, said they agreed with the president-elect's diagnosis of the perils faced by the economic recession, but they continued to question parts of the plan.
View All Comments »