제목 | 美 유권자의 23% 차지… 매케인 지지 61% / | ||
---|---|---|---|
글쓴이 | 등록일 | 2008-08-18 | |
출처 | 조회수 | 1434 |
다음은 조선닷컴 http://www.chosun.com 에 있는 기사입니다.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
공화 성향 목사와 달리 정치적 중립 입장 고수
릭 워런 목사는
릭 워런(Warren·54) 새들백 교회 담임목사는 '목적이 이끄는 삶'이라는 베스트셀러로 한국에도 잘 알려져 있다. 침례교 목사의 아들로 태어난 워런은 1980년 새들백 교회를 세워, 2만2000여명이 예배하는 대형교회로 성장시켰다. 그러나 교인이 1만명에 이를 때까지도 교회 건물을 따로 두지 않고 여러 시설을 전전하며 예배장소로 썼다. 워런은 각 매체가 선정하는 '미국을 이끄는 지도자들' 명단에 늘 낄 만큼, 미국 사회에 큰 영향력을 발휘하는 기독교계의 '대표 주자'다.
그러나 워런은 복음주의 계열의 목사이면서도 고(故) 제리 폴웰(Falwell)이나 팻 로버트슨(Robertson) 등 공화당 성향의 목사들과 달리, 정치적으로 중립적인 입장을 고수해 왔다. 미 시사주간지 타임은 "20세기 미 기독교의 두 원형은 빌리 그레이엄(Graham) 목사와 기독교 우파인데, 워런은 그 어느 쪽에도 속하지 않는다"고 했다.
오히려 캘리포니아에서 태어나고 자란 워런이 민주당 성향에 가깝다는 얘기도 있다. 워런은 "낙태·동성결혼 같은 (전통적인 기독교인이 반대하는) 이슈보다는, 기후변화·빈곤·에이즈 같은 이슈에 더 관심을 갖고 있다"고 평소 말해 왔다. 워런은 지구상의 모든 지역 교회를 해당 지역에서 빈곤·문맹 퇴치, 의료 서비스 등을 공급하는 기지로 삼자는 'PEACE' 계획을 5년 전 발표하기도 했다.
|
|
Americans have never expected our public servants to be perfect. In fact on many levels it can sometimes be comforting to know they are not. Foibles, mistakes, faux pas all remind us that while they are called upon to lead us through times of tremendous challenge, that at the end of the day they are one of us. They are not from some line of tyrannical despot royalty allowed absolute power.
Realizing this however also causes us to understand that while they may make mistakes certain qualities are particularly more helpful, attractive, and necessary when vetting the nation's leadership. Honesty, ethical integrity, and transparent commitment to the ideals of our nation are the non-negotiables that we seek, need, and demand. Barack Obama fails the test on all three levels. Saturday night he demonstrated none of the above - and in the presence of the most recognizable mega-pastor in America.
As an aside - my own past issues with Rick Warren being what they are - it was my opinion that Warren hosted perhaps the most helpful presidential forum to date in the 2008 White House race. This shocked me - but to my pleasant surprise - was greatly beneficial for the nation to see. For while Warren and Obama may have been tied at the hip for a few years now, even in the friendly confines of Saddleback Church, Obama was unable to speak truth, and now the world saw it exposed.
His most outright lie was his claim that abortion rates had gone up over the last eight years. Within minutes bloggers at TownHall.com, pro-life groups like Americans United for Life, and even the analyst panel on Fox News Channel had the stats in front of the American public. Abortion rates have actually decreased over the last eight years, and have done so in significant fashion. In fact in January of 2008 it was reported by the Guttmacher Institute and repeated in U.S. News and World Reports that abortions had reached a three decade low.
For Obama to so blatantly say otherwise demonstrated paramount ignorance; ignorance to such degree that he should not be elected dog catcher, much less the most powerful chair of the free world. And if not ignorant then he was more than willing to manipulate the issue by forthright lying to the largest audience of evangelicals in America, and a pastor on national television.
But his willingness to do so is easily parsed in the world of liberal far-left politics today. There is no real consequence to telling untruths in the world of the academic elite that Obama stems from. Every time he opens his mouth it is an opportunity for him to appear as though he is weighing multiple sides of an issue and with his smooth articulation drip words that his sycophantic, brainwashed, supporters believe are divinely inspired script.
But they aren't because he's just a man, just like any other man, with temptations, sin, and deficiencies of judgement. Only Obama's deficiencies in judgement seem unparalleled in recent history.
When asked most forthrightly by Warren as to when a child should have its God given rights protected, Obama balked and claimed "knowing when something" that is obviously living, "begins to live" was, "above his pay grade."
Even as a father he knew it was a lie.
Go back to the day when Michelle first told him that she was pregnant with their first daughter. Was his daughter alive? If someone had desired to injure his baby girl while developing in his wife's body would he have "misunderstood" as to whether it would have been morally wrong? How deep would his anger have been if someone had robbed him of the relationship with his little girl?
And yet this flail speaks to his fundamental misunderstanding of morality and whether or not his moral judgement could be trusted as the most powerful man on earth.
Obama has added even further doubt by outright lying about why he supported the exact same "Born Alive Infant Protection Act" that was even too radical and immoral for Barbara Boxer, Hillary Clinton, and Dianne Feinstein to support. Put differently Obama is the only elected official on record to ever vote in favor of denying life-saving medical care to children who had been born but that were struggling for life.
Is that a decision too confusing so as to be "above the pay grade" as well?
It isn't for most Americans.
But don't let the facts be confused, Obama is now lying about his lie, and claiming that those who say he is lying are the ones doing so.
So is he confused about the facts, bought and sold by the abortion lobby, or just manipulating the issue for bait and switch political gain?
The answer to all three is likely "yes."
And since it is we the tax-payers who hire the person, and give our permission to run our nation, perhaps we should consider keeping Obama at the "pay grade" of his U.S. Senate seat, where his convoluted intellect can be kept in check and balance by those who are not as morally confused, ethically challenged, or blatantly dishonest.
And when his present term concludes - another vacation to Hawaii would do him well.