헌법을 생각하는 변호사 모임

보도자료

제목 美 유권자의 23% 차지… 매케인 지지 61% /
글쓴이 등록일 2008-08-18
출처 조회수 1434

다음은 조선닷컴  http://www.chosun.com 에 있는 기사입니다.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

美 유권자의 23% 차지… 매케인 지지 61%
 
美 유권자의 23% 차지… 매케인 지지 61%

무슬림 오해받는 오바마 "예수는 내 구원자"
 
 
워싱턴=최우석 특파원 wschoi@chosun.com 기자의 다른 기사보기
원정환 기자 won@chosun.com 기자의 다른 기사보기
"예수 그리스도는 나의 죄를 위해 대신 죽었다."(버락 오바마 민주당 상원의원) "결혼은 남녀 간의 결합이다."(존 매케인 공화당 상원의원).

오바마(Obama)와 매케인(McCain) 두 대선 후보가 16일 일제히 기독교인들에게 '신앙 고백'을 하며 구애(求愛)에 나섰다. 성경을 문자 그대로 믿고 실천하려는 미 개신교 복음주의(evangelicalism) 대형 교회인 캘리포니아주의 새들백 교회가 주선한 포럼에서였다. 두 사람은 시차를 두고 이 교회의 릭 워런(Warren) 담임 목사와 마주앉아, 각각 1시간에 걸쳐 워런 목사가 던지는 ▲신앙심 ▲낙태에 대한 견해 ▲악마의 존재 여부 ▲리더십 ▲자신의 도덕적 결함 등 20여 건의 질문에 답했다. 두 후보가 서로 토론하지는 않았다.

방청석에는 이 교회의 교인 2200여명이 자리잡았다. 대부분 백인들이었다. 이날 포럼은 CNN방송이 생중계했다.

먼저 포럼 인터뷰에 나선 오바마는 '기독교 여행(Christian Journey)'이라는 12쪽짜리 소책자를 방청객들에게 나눠주며, 자신이 무슬림이라는 일부의 오해를 씻으려고 애썼다. 미국의 최대 도덕적 결함을 지목하면서, 신약 마태복음에 있는 예수의 발언을 인용해 "너희 중에 가장 작은 자에게 한 것이 내게 한 것이다"는 계명을 따르지 못한 것이라고 말했다. 그러나 그는 '인간의 생명이 시작한 때'에 대해선 "내가 답할 사안이 아니다"고 해 낙태에 대해 반대하지 않음을 밝혔다. 또 동성연애에 대해서도 "결혼의 의미를 좁게 정의하는 식으로 헌법을 수정하는 것에는 반대한다"고 해, 보수적인 복음주의 개신교인들의 마음을 얻는 데에는 한계를 드러냈다.

 
▲ 16일 미 캘리포니아주 새들백(Saddleback) 교회에서 열린 대선후보들의 포럼에 참석한 존 매케인(McCain) 상원의원(맨 왼쪽), 릭 워런(Warren) 목사(가운데), 버락 오바마(Obama) 상원의원이 환호하는 청중들에게 인사하고 있다. /블룸버그
그러나 매케인은 단호하게 낙태를 반대했고, "악마는 제압의 대상" "결혼은 남녀 간의 결합" 등 복음주의 유권자들의 입맛에 맞는 말들을 쏟아냈다. 그는 생애의 최대 도덕적 결함으로 "첫 번째 결혼 실패"를 들었다. 매케인은 유부남 시절에 지금의 둘째 부인 신디(당시 미혼)를 만났다.

후보가 "가장 현명하다고 생각하는 3명"으로, 오바마는 부인 미셸, 외할머니, 에드워드 케네디(Kennedy) 상원의원을, 매케인은 데이비드 페트레이어스(Petraeus) 이라크 주둔 미군 사령관, 흑인 인권 운동가 출신인 존 루이스(Lewis) 민주당 하원의원, 그리고 자신의 조언가이자 여성 CEO 출신인 메그 위트먼(Whitman) 전 이베이 회장을 언급했다.

복음주의 기독교인은 미 전체 유권자의 23%를 차지한다. 역대 미 대선에서 이들 표의 향배가 대통령을 결정했다고 해도 과언이 아니다. 현재 백인 복음주의자들의 61%는 매케인을 지지한다. 이 덕분에, 15일의 갤럽 지지도 조사에서 두 후보는 똑같이 44%를 기록했다.


공화 성향 목사와 달리 정치적 중립 입장 고수

릭 워런 목사는


릭 워런(Warren·54) 새들백 교회 담임목사는 '목적이 이끄는 삶'이라는 베스트셀러로 한국에도 잘 알려져 있다. 침례교 목사의 아들로 태어난 워런은 1980년 새들백 교회를 세워, 2만2000여명이 예배하는 대형교회로 성장시켰다. 그러나 교인이 1만명에 이를 때까지도 교회 건물을 따로 두지 않고 여러 시설을 전전하며 예배장소로 썼다. 워런은 각 매체가 선정하는 '미국을 이끄는 지도자들' 명단에 늘 낄 만큼, 미국 사회에 큰 영향력을 발휘하는 기독교계의 '대표 주자'다.

그러나 워런은 복음주의 계열의 목사이면서도 고(故) 제리 폴웰(Falwell)이나 팻 로버트슨(Robertson) 등 공화당 성향의 목사들과 달리, 정치적으로 중립적인 입장을 고수해 왔다. 미 시사주간지 타임은 "20세기 미 기독교의 두 원형은 빌리 그레이엄(Graham) 목사와 기독교 우파인데, 워런은 그 어느 쪽에도 속하지 않는다"고 했다.

오히려 캘리포니아에서 태어나고 자란 워런이 민주당 성향에 가깝다는 얘기도 있다. 워런은 "낙태·동성결혼 같은 (전통적인 기독교인이 반대하는) 이슈보다는, 기후변화·빈곤·에이즈 같은 이슈에 더 관심을 갖고 있다"고 평소 말해 왔다. 워런은 지구상의 모든 지역 교회를 해당 지역에서 빈곤·문맹 퇴치, 의료 서비스 등을 공급하는 기지로 삼자는 'PEACE' 계획을 5년 전 발표하기도 했다.

 

입력 : 2008.08.17 23:38 / 수정 : 2008.08.17 23:39
 
---------------------------------------------------------
다음은 Townhall  http://townhall.com 에 있는 기사입니다
 
 
----------------------------------------------------------
 
Sunday, August 17, 2008
Kevin McCullough :: Townhall.com Columnist
Above my Pay Grade?
by Kevin McCullough
 
 
Poll
Are you car's tires properly inflated?

Americans have never expected our public servants to be perfect. In fact on many levels it can sometimes be comforting to know they are not. Foibles, mistakes, faux pas all remind us that while they are called upon to lead us through times of tremendous challenge, that at the end of the day they are one of us. They are not from some line of tyrannical despot royalty allowed absolute power.

 

Realizing this however also causes us to understand that while they may make mistakes certain qualities are particularly more helpful, attractive, and necessary when vetting the nation's leadership. Honesty, ethical integrity, and transparent commitment to the ideals of our nation are the non-negotiables that we seek, need, and demand. Barack Obama fails the test on all three levels. Saturday night he demonstrated none of the above - and in the presence of the most recognizable mega-pastor in America.

 

As an aside - my own past issues with Rick Warren being what they are - it was my opinion that Warren hosted perhaps the most helpful presidential forum to date in the 2008 White House race. This shocked me - but to my pleasant surprise - was greatly beneficial for the nation to see. For while Warren and Obama may have been tied at the hip for a few years now, even in the friendly confines of Saddleback Church, Obama was unable to speak truth, and now the world saw it exposed.

 

His most outright lie was his claim that abortion rates had gone up over the last eight years. Within minutes bloggers at TownHall.com, pro-life groups like Americans United for Life, and even the analyst panel on Fox News Channel had the stats in front of the American public. Abortion rates have actually decreased over the last eight years, and have done so in significant fashion. In fact in January of 2008 it was reported by the Guttmacher Institute and repeated in U.S. News and World Reports that abortions had reached a three decade low.

 

For Obama to so blatantly say otherwise demonstrated paramount ignorance; ignorance to such degree that he should not be elected dog catcher, much less the most powerful chair of the free world. And if not ignorant then he was more than willing to manipulate the issue by forthright lying to the largest audience of evangelicals in America, and a pastor on national television.

 

But his willingness to do so is easily parsed in the world of liberal far-left politics today. There is no real consequence to telling untruths in the world of the academic elite that Obama stems from. Every time he opens his mouth it is an opportunity for him to appear as though he is weighing multiple sides of an issue and with his smooth articulation drip words that his sycophantic, brainwashed, supporters believe are divinely inspired script.

 

But they aren't because he's just a man, just like any other man, with temptations, sin, and deficiencies of judgement. Only Obama's deficiencies in judgement seem unparalleled in recent history.

 

When asked most forthrightly by Warren as to when a child should have its God given rights protected, Obama balked and claimed "knowing when something" that is obviously living, "begins to live" was, "above his pay grade."

 

Even as a father he knew it was a lie.

 

Go back to the day when Michelle first told him that she was pregnant with their first daughter. Was his daughter alive? If someone had desired to injure his baby girl while developing in his wife's body would he have "misunderstood" as to whether it would have been morally wrong? How deep would his anger have been if someone had robbed him of the relationship with his little girl?

 

And yet this flail speaks to his fundamental misunderstanding of morality and whether or not his moral judgement could be trusted as the most powerful man on earth. Continued...

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
 
Sunday, August 17, 2008
Kevin McCullough :: Townhall.com Columnist
Above my Pay Grade?
by Kevin McCullough
 
Poll
Are you car's tires properly inflated?

Obama has added even further doubt by outright lying about why he supported the exact same "Born Alive Infant Protection Act" that was even too radical and immoral for Barbara Boxer, Hillary Clinton, and Dianne Feinstein to support. Put differently Obama is the only elected official on record to ever vote in favor of denying life-saving medical care to children who had been born but that were struggling for life.

 

Is that a decision too confusing so as to be "above the pay grade" as well?

 

It isn't for most Americans.

 

But don't let the facts be confused, Obama is now lying about his lie, and claiming that those who say he is lying are the ones doing so.

 

So is he confused about the facts, bought and sold by the abortion lobby, or just manipulating the issue for bait and switch political gain?

 

The answer to all three is likely "yes."

 

And since it is we the tax-payers who hire the person, and give our permission to run our nation, perhaps we should consider keeping Obama at the "pay grade" of his U.S. Senate seat, where his convoluted intellect can be kept in check and balance by those who are not as morally confused, ethically challenged, or blatantly dishonest.

 

And when his present term concludes - another vacation to Hawaii would do him well.

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | < Previous
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
----------------------------------------
 
 

 

Above my Pay Grade?
 
Kevin McCullough
Sunday, August 17, 2008
 

Americans have never expected our public servants to be perfect. In fact on many levels it can sometimes be comforting to know they are not. Foibles, mistakes, faux pas all remind us that while they are called upon to lead us through times of tremendous challenge, that at the end of the day they are one of us. They are not from some line of tyrannical despot royalty allowed absolute power.

Realizing this however also causes us to understand that while they may make mistakes certain qualities are particularly more helpful, attractive, and necessary when vetting the nation's leadership. Honesty, ethical integrity, and transparent commitment to the ideals of our nation are the non-negotiables that we seek, need, and demand. Barack Obama fails the test on all three levels. Saturday night he demonstrated none of the above - and in the presence of the most recognizable mega-pastor in America.

As an aside - my own past issues with Rick Warren being what they are - it was my opinion that Warren hosted perhaps the most helpful presidential forum to date in the 2008 White House race. This shocked me - but to my pleasant surprise - was greatly beneficial for the nation to see. For while Warren and Obama may have been tied at the hip for a few years now, even in the friendly confines of Saddleback Church, Obama was unable to speak truth, and now the world saw it exposed.

His most outright lie was his claim that abortion rates had gone up over the last eight years. Within minutes bloggers at TownHall.com, pro-life groups like Americans United for Life, and even the analyst panel on Fox News Channel had the stats in front of the American public. Abortion rates have actually decreased over the last eight years, and have done so in significant fashion. In fact in January of 2008 it was reported by the Guttmacher Institute and repeated in U.S. News and World Reports that abortions had reached a three decade low.

For Obama to so blatantly say otherwise demonstrated paramount ignorance; ignorance to such degree that he should not be elected dog catcher, much less the most powerful chair of the free world. And if not ignorant then he was more than willing to manipulate the issue by forthright lying to the largest audience of evangelicals in America, and a pastor on national television.

But his willingness to do so is easily parsed in the world of liberal far-left politics today. There is no real consequence to telling untruths in the world of the academic elite that Obama stems from. Every time he opens his mouth it is an opportunity for him to appear as though he is weighing multiple sides of an issue and with his smooth articulation drip words that his sycophantic, brainwashed, supporters believe are divinely inspired script.

But they aren't because he's just a man, just like any other man, with temptations, sin, and deficiencies of judgement. Only Obama's deficiencies in judgement seem unparalleled in recent history.

When asked most forthrightly by Warren as to when a child should have its God given rights protected, Obama balked and claimed "knowing when something" that is obviously living, "begins to live" was, "above his pay grade."

Even as a father he knew it was a lie.

Go back to the day when Michelle first told him that she was pregnant with their first daughter. Was his daughter alive? If someone had desired to injure his baby girl while developing in his wife's body would he have "misunderstood" as to whether it would have been morally wrong? How deep would his anger have been if someone had robbed him of the relationship with his little girl?

And yet this flail speaks to his fundamental misunderstanding of morality and whether or not his moral judgement could be trusted as the most powerful man on earth.

Obama has added even further doubt by outright lying about why he supported the exact same "Born Alive Infant Protection Act" that was even too radical and immoral for Barbara Boxer, Hillary Clinton, and Dianne Feinstein to support. Put differently Obama is the only elected official on record to ever vote in favor of denying life-saving medical care to children who had been born but that were struggling for life.

Is that a decision too confusing so as to be "above the pay grade" as well?

It isn't for most Americans.

But don't let the facts be confused, Obama is now lying about his lie, and claiming that those who say he is lying are the ones doing so.

So is he confused about the facts, bought and sold by the abortion lobby, or just manipulating the issue for bait and switch political gain?

The answer to all three is likely "yes."

And since it is we the tax-payers who hire the person, and give our permission to run our nation, perhaps we should consider keeping Obama at the "pay grade" of his U.S. Senate seat, where his convoluted intellect can be kept in check and balance by those who are not as morally confused, ethically challenged, or blatantly dishonest.

And when his present term concludes - another vacation to Hawaii would do him well.